Which option is NOT primarily a safety-related nursing diagnosis?

Which option is NOT primarily a safety-related nursing diagnosis?

• A. Risk for infection.
• B. Risk for falls.
• C. Risk for poisoning.
• D. Impaired skin integrity.

Answer: (D)

Distinguishing safety-related diagnoses from tissue integrity concerns helps you see what the item is really asking about. Safety-facing diagnoses focus on preventing harm in the patient’s environment or condition: risk for infection flags danger from pathogens or compromised defenses, risk for falls highlights danger during movement, and risk for poisoning points to exposure to toxins or hazardous substances. Impaired skin integrity, by contrast, centers on the condition of the skin tissue itself—the health of the skin and underlying tissues—and on healing and maintaining tissue integrity. Its primary aim is to address tissue damage and prevent further deterioration, not to prevent environmental or health harm. That makes it not primarily a safety-related nursing diagnosis.

Distinguishing safety-related diagnoses from tissue integrity concerns helps you see what the item is really asking about. Safety-facing diagnoses focus on preventing harm in the patient’s environment or condition: risk for infection flags danger from pathogens or compromised defenses, risk for falls highlights danger during movement, and risk for poisoning points to exposure to toxins or hazardous substances. Impaired skin integrity, by contrast, centers on the condition of the skin tissue itself—the health of the skin and underlying tissues—and on healing and maintaining tissue integrity. Its primary aim is to address tissue damage and prevent further deterioration, not to prevent environmental or health harm. That makes it not primarily a safety-related nursing diagnosis.